The percentage of cyclists that break traffic laws in the U.S. is comparable to that of motorists. A naturalistic study of bicyclists in Florida’s Tampa Bay area found that bicyclists complied with traffic laws around 88% of the time during the day and 87% at night. In contrast, motorists interacting with bicyclists adhered to traffic laws slightly less frequently, with a compliance rate of 85% during the day. This study challenges the perception that cyclists are more likely to disregard traffic laws than drivers. [1]
Interestingly, the reasons cyclists and motorists break traffic laws often differ. While motorists typically do so to save time, cyclists often do so for their own safety, such as crossing intersections early to increase visibility and avoid potential hazards.
Cyclists and Traffic Law Insights
Researchers from the University of South Florida conducted a study involving 100 cyclists in the Tampa area, equipping their bicycles with sensors, cameras, and GPS devices to track their movements over a cumulative 2,000 hours. The findings challenge the notion that cyclists frequently flout traffic laws.
The study revealed that cyclists complied with traffic laws 88% of the time during the day and 87% at night. In comparison, drivers interacting with these cyclists adhered to traffic laws 85% of the time during the day. The nighttime compliance rate for drivers wasn’t reported due to insufficient data.
Throughout the study, three near-miss incidents involving right-turning drivers were documented, two of which were due to drivers not yielding. One incident involved a cyclist crossing during a “Do Not Walk” signal, suggesting sidewalk riding, though street conditions weren’t specified.
In 21 right-turn scenarios without near-misses, cyclists followed the rules in all instances, while drivers failed to yield in four cases. There was one collision recorded, where a driver rear-ended a cyclist waiting to turn left on a road without a bike lane or sidewalk, forcing the cyclist into the general travel lane. Researchers attributed the crash to inadequate bike infrastructure and driver impatience.
The study indicated that cyclists preferred bike lanes or sidewalks over general travel lanes, which posed a higher crash risk. When bike lanes were available, cyclists used them 87% of the time, opted for sidewalks 8.7% of the time, and rode in the motor vehicle lane 4.3% of the time.
Nineteen close calls involved drivers passing cyclists with less than three feet of clearance, with 14 of these incidents occurring where no bike lane was present. This underscores the importance of dedicated bike lanes in enhancing cyclist safety.
While the study highlighted high compliance rates among cyclists, it also suggested improvements in bike infrastructure as a crucial measure to enhance safety, rather than focusing solely on cyclist education.
The study’s limitations include potential behavior changes due to the monitoring equipment and not accounting for scenarios where strict adherence to traffic laws might compromise cyclist safety. Nonetheless, the research provides valuable insights into cyclist behavior and the critical role of infrastructure in ensuring their safety.
Additionally, a survey highlighted that both cyclists and drivers ignore traffic regulations at similar rates, with 7-8% of cyclists and 8-9% of drivers committing infractions. Interestingly, cyclists often break traffic laws for perceived safety reasons, such as getting a head start at a red light to increase visibility and avoid potential hazards (The World from PRX).
These findings suggest that while there is a perception of cyclists being more reckless, the percentage of cyclists that break traffic laws is comparable to that of drivers.
Cycling on roads can be perilous if you don’t follow bicycle laws, regardless of the state you live in. These laws are designed to safeguard cyclists and reduce the risk of severe injury or death in the event of an accident. It’s crucial to adhere to them at all times.
However, even when cyclists comply with all relevant laws, accidents caused by drivers can still occur. If you’ve been injured due to a driver’s negligence, you may have grounds for a personal injury claim to seek compensation. This compensation can cover both economic and non-economic damages. Economic damages include medical expenses, property damage, and lost wages, while non-economic damages cover aspects such as pain and suffering.
Contact Howard Injury Law:
📲 702.331.5722
🗣 Se Habla Español
🗣 Wǒmen shuō
For ongoing news updates and safety tips, follow us on Instagram, Facebook, or X and stay informed.